Category: sharing economy

I have a piece called “Sharing and Caring” up at Jacobin (a fine publication. you should read it anyway). It asks what a left-wing view of the sharing economy should be. Thanks to the editors for their work on it.

In separate announcements, two of the most well-capitalized sharing-economy companies (Lyft and Airbnb) announced moves away from their “sharing” and co-operative roots. I suggested they would at the end of this post:

To be successful, the venture-capital-funded “sharing economy” will be forced to lose all those aspects of informal sharing that makes “sharing” attractive, and to keep those aspects that erode neighbourhoods, erode employment rights, and remove basic standards. And if they succeed, they will have used the language of sharing to bring about an unregulated, free-market, neoliberal economy.

In September Lyft, Sidecar, and Uber (with its Uber X service) were approved in California as a new class of “Transportation Network Companies”. Now both Lyft and Sidecar have done away with the pretence that the money passing from passenger to driver was a “donation” and have instituted a system of formal fares (as Uber already does). The idea that passengers may pay more or less than the suggested donation, which is a part of the casual and informal nature of the exchanges that sharing economy companies appeal to, is now gone for Californians.

In a separate move, Lyft has instituted a new “surge pricing” initiative, which amounts to requiring a 25% additional payment to drivers during periods of heavy demand. Similar to Uber’s surge pricing, this move appeals directly to price as a means of rationing, and assumes that drivers are motivated primarily by money, despite the heavy use of community-focused language that Lyft uses in its marketing. We’ll have to see if the attempt by Taxi companies to raise money to push back gains any momentum.

These moves are part of a rapid shift of the Venture Capital-funded part of the transport side of the sharing economy. They follow the sale of Lyft’s original Zimride Carpool service to rental-car giant Enterprise in July, the sale of Zipcar to Avis Budget in January, and the shift of RelayRides to longer-term rentals. The moves are a fascinating contrast to the success of French company Blablacar, which has a model much closer to the original carpool idea, is growing by leaps and bounds, and is now moving into the UK.

The best treatment I’ve seen of the latest changes in this transport area is by Liz Gannes at All Things D.

The other big announcement came from Airbnb, at a press conference at their very fancy headquarters. In addition to announcing new versions of their mobile apps, CEO Brian Chesky stepped away from his “our hosts are regular people” line to tell them “You’re in the business of hospitality”. Airbnb is bringing back a program calls Superhost, which “is meant to identify and reward some of the platform’s most active and highly recommended hosts”; as well as offering a Host Rewards Program to encourage people to rent more often. So again there is a move away from regular people “occasionally” renting a room out and earning a little extra money, to a revenue model that is driven by higher volume hosts. Airbnb already relies on these increasingly professional hosts for a significant chunk of its revenue as I showed in my look at its New York data: that trend is only going to accelerate.

Again, this week’s steps are part of a rapid movement. Over the last year Airbnb has moved towards a more formal security and identification system, demanding government documents as proof of identity along with the usual Facebook information. Not, it seems, that relying on positive reviews is foolproof, as a Washington DC woman found out recently. Airbnb Brian Chesky increasingly refers to his hosts as “micro-entrepreneurs”: emphasizing the market-driven view of the business that he has, and again moving away from a community model of sharing. The term started, I think, with TaskRabbit, another “sharing” company that is walking the same path: less community, more temp agency in Rabbit’s clothing.

Push back from cities from Berlin and Paris to Roanoke City in Virginia to Grand Rapids in Michigan to Vancouver is growing, and the New York Case continues to roll on, with one notorious Airbnb landlord settling with the city. The danger here is that Airbnb’s hubris will damage other, less arrogant and less revenue-hungry companies who have engaged in apartment rentals for years (including the lovely one in Rome I was lucky enough to rent last spring) and that the venture capitalists, instead of bringing in a new level of sharing, will clumsily damage what’s already there.

Since I did a post about Airbnb’s business in New York, Airbnb has published its own study and so there has been some follow-up interest in my numbers, here, here, and here.

The data and the conclusions cannot be conclusive because they are a sample (though a big one) of limited publicly-available information. I’m happy to be corrected, but Airbnb would have to release some real numbers to do so, instead of silly 300 word “studies”.

I don’t have new data, and I think there is enough detail in the original post to understand the sources and the limits of the analysis, but here is a PDF presentation that tries to make the conclusions a bit more clear. Here is a version formatted for download and printing.

[gview file=”http://tomslee.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/airbnbny.pdf” profile=”3″ save=”0″]

Another collection of links (about 75) with almost no commentary. There’s so much happening this may be a regular feature.

• Airbnb:
  • The big story is the New York challenge, in which the Attorney General’s office is demanding Airbnb data. Airbnb has loudly refused, the AG’s office says their refusal exaggerates what the state is asking for. Stil, the Internet Association has filed on Airbnb’s behalf.
  • What is the Airbnb business? Airbnb paints a picture of community in this study. (mentioned last week). The New York Times casts some doubts on the Airbnb business model here, with commentary at the Real Deal here. Both Sam Roudman at TechPresident and Nancy Scola at NextCity use my results from here to question the claims. I should have something more on this soon.
  • In favour of Airbnb: some people like the breaking rules, Cato says govt is bad, and so do these people. Meanwhile: Brooklyn. And here is the New York Post.
  • Hosts: One big story, which came out late last week and has been reposted in several places, was how to buy an apartment just to rent out on Airbnb. Some, however, are dubious about it. Other articles tell us how to manage a six figure Airbnb business, how to rent out your second home, warn you that it’s more more complex than you might have thought, or offer tips. If you’re doing it seriously, a new set of services is likely to build around this industry, like Guesthop, or Taskrabbit, natch or others. All these pieces indicate a future that is different from the “Javier likes to show off his favorite Latin dance spots to travelers” vibe that they promote.
  • Effect on rentals: old from SF,
  • History: First pitch deck, it was a tough road before the media moment and now you get to work here.
  • Commentary from Expedia CEO, the travel industry, Conde Nast Traveler, Consumerist, Hotel News Now.
  • Stories: misleading photos, world tour,
• More broadly on the sharing economy:
  • Piper-Jaffray Report: The Disruption of Sharing, a new book (also here), a directory, opportunities, changing patterns. Peter Coffee.
  • Young Global Leaders, strike back, capitalism and regulation,
  • In Ann Arbor, in the Arab World (again) adopted by corporations, in the Philippines, in Asia, in Chicago.
  • A tidy profit, mixing business and social change, feel good inside,
  • Or not.
  • Also, Couchsurfing, reputation as commodity, Dinner with Peers,
• Ridesharing (and Lyft):
  • and taxis in San Francisco, and in Baltimore,
  • insurance
  • Accenture on insurance, parts 1, 2,
  • parasitic, entrepreneur!, stalker,
  • Freelancers: contradictory views here and here. Also here.
• TaskRabbit:
  • casualized work (repeated from here), outsourcing,
  • having problems?, maybe (old), lacking traction, background checks,
  • real jobs,