A Riot to Tweet?
If there is one thing that could make me look with favour on the idea of "banning suspected rioters from social media", it's reading Jeff Jarvis lecture the UK government about free speech, pointing to the US constitution and continually promoting his new book as he does so.
Jarvis' argument combines slanted rhetorical questions with banal platitudes. He asks "Who is to say what communication and content should be banned from whom on what platform? On my BlackBerry? My computer? My telephone? My street corner?" To which Mr. Cameron would probably say "Me and the police. Weren't you listening?"
And then there are these:
- When anyone's speech is not free, no one's speech is free.
- Censorship is not the path to civility. Only speech is.
- Restricting speech cannot be done except in the context of free speech.
- A tool used for good can be used for bad.
- When debating public identity, one must decide what a public is.
To which I say: "If you have something to say, just say it."
In short, Jarvis knows nothing about the riots but knows that any interference with Twitter … Continue reading